Mr. Maier et al: Your software is absolutely fascinating and highly impressive, but I need some technical explanations to understand what the CNF dialog box represents to shorten my trial and error work on mid-fifties 78s.
What does a blue dot represent? A peak or valley on a band pass or notch curve? An FFT calculation point?
What effect does horizontal movement of blue dots achieve?
Any value in pulling one blue dot below another i.e., stacking at a lower setting?
What is more effective at removing broadband noise without introducing artifacts, higher threshold setting with lower attenuation, or very low threshold with higher attenuation?
Why are the introduced artifacts ?swirley,? or like the intermittent long hiss of an out-of-centre disc?
How do you reduce the ?hollowness? sometimes introduced?
Are blue dot adjustments most useful in the upper end of the recorded spectrum?
The noise at the beginning of the recording is higher than the end of the recording and the result after application of the CNF is a residual "hard noise sound" that is non-uniform in nature and almost appears to be as stated earlier to be generated by an eccentric disc, although observance of the tracking does not indicate such. Should some residual noise be left to be removed by the Medium or other filter? Is there any value in a second application of CNF with another re-sampling -- it seemed to me to be slightly improved, but I expect at some deterioration of the original content. Just how much essential content can be heard in "keep residue"-- how intelligible should it be?
Thanks in advance,
Malcolm
What does a blue dot represent? A peak or valley on a band pass or notch curve? An FFT calculation point?
What effect does horizontal movement of blue dots achieve?
Any value in pulling one blue dot below another i.e., stacking at a lower setting?
What is more effective at removing broadband noise without introducing artifacts, higher threshold setting with lower attenuation, or very low threshold with higher attenuation?
Why are the introduced artifacts ?swirley,? or like the intermittent long hiss of an out-of-centre disc?
How do you reduce the ?hollowness? sometimes introduced?
Are blue dot adjustments most useful in the upper end of the recorded spectrum?
The noise at the beginning of the recording is higher than the end of the recording and the result after application of the CNF is a residual "hard noise sound" that is non-uniform in nature and almost appears to be as stated earlier to be generated by an eccentric disc, although observance of the tracking does not indicate such. Should some residual noise be left to be removed by the Medium or other filter? Is there any value in a second application of CNF with another re-sampling -- it seemed to me to be slightly improved, but I expect at some deterioration of the original content. Just how much essential content can be heard in "keep residue"-- how intelligible should it be?
Thanks in advance,
Malcolm
Comment