Just another question regarding cleanup when you have a disc recorded slower than it should be played (e.g., 45rpm mastering of a 78).
It seems that you may get an added bonus if you de-click the file at the slow speed as the click should cover less of the sound of the original recording, hence you interpolate a smaller portion of the recording. Is that correct?
Here's what I mean. If you have a 4-minute 78 that you record at half that speed, you end up with a file that is about twice as long as the original recording, or about 6 minutes. Each click that is introduced by the needle hitting a defect or piece of dust,etc. alters the sound for a certain length of time (say a tenth of a second, just for an example). That would cover about a tenth of a second if you were recording at the original speed, but would be something like 1/20th of a second if your recording is at half speed.
It seems you get more of the original music if you record at a slower rpm. Am I thinking correctly?
Dan
It seems that you may get an added bonus if you de-click the file at the slow speed as the click should cover less of the sound of the original recording, hence you interpolate a smaller portion of the recording. Is that correct?
Here's what I mean. If you have a 4-minute 78 that you record at half that speed, you end up with a file that is about twice as long as the original recording, or about 6 minutes. Each click that is introduced by the needle hitting a defect or piece of dust,etc. alters the sound for a certain length of time (say a tenth of a second, just for an example). That would cover about a tenth of a second if you were recording at the original speed, but would be something like 1/20th of a second if your recording is at half speed.
It seems you get more of the original music if you record at a slower rpm. Am I thinking correctly?
Dan
Comment