I haven't tried the "split and recombine" method. I suspect that it might be useful for some of my older records from the 60s, when I was a teen ager and using REALLY cheap stereos. I actually have a few mono albums, until about '65 they were available as alternatives to the stereo album, and a few dollars ... well ... cheaper.
I haven't tried running two instances of the software, but aside from taxing my computer, I think it would also confuse my brain.
I have used the "bypass" box on the filters, sometimes, but it's a little more cumbersome to stop, back up a bit, and start the filter back up again when I think I heard something I want to verify -- easier if I could just click the mouse and "play from here" in sync. And, of course, If I am happy with the result, I have to remember to run the filter again, for real! THAT'S really the weak link in the chain, and why I tend to run the filter and compare the "before and after" files!
Still, to keep this in perspective, it's just about the only thing I wish I could do that I can't do. And there are alternative methods.
I haven't tried running two instances of the software, but aside from taxing my computer, I think it would also confuse my brain.
I have used the "bypass" box on the filters, sometimes, but it's a little more cumbersome to stop, back up a bit, and start the filter back up again when I think I heard something I want to verify -- easier if I could just click the mouse and "play from here" in sync. And, of course, If I am happy with the result, I have to remember to run the filter again, for real! THAT'S really the weak link in the chain, and why I tend to run the filter and compare the "before and after" files!
Still, to keep this in perspective, it's just about the only thing I wish I could do that I can't do. And there are alternative methods.
Comment