Guys,
It does look like there is a +6dB gain difference in the VPA at 96kHz vs 44.1 and 48k. It seems to be just an overall gain offset, not a different curve. I can fix this in this upcoming release.
96kdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15675/1567579c6495faefcacf68042d30f1ed8aaa941a" alt="Click image for larger version
Name: image_524.png
Views: 132
Size: 19.4 KB
ID: 53065"
48kdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4785/e478559175378060fc51f61488ce31a6b045bdd7" alt="Click image for larger version
Name: VPP48k.png
Views: 129
Size: 19.7 KB
ID: 53066"
44.1kdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19705/19705eee7dcf3cb75c3a868ff7ff99dfc85a765e" alt="Click image for larger version
Name: VPP441k.png
Views: 125
Size: 19.4 KB
ID: 53067"
The sample rate conversions are pretty darn good, especially if you do a master quality conversion. Almost no detectable difference except a slight roll off about 20kHz. The CD quality conversion does have more roll off.
As for the time difference, there will be some difference. I have not looked into the numbers you have here to see if that is excessive or not.
Rick
It does look like there is a +6dB gain difference in the VPA at 96kHz vs 44.1 and 48k. It seems to be just an overall gain offset, not a different curve. I can fix this in this upcoming release.
96k
48k
44.1k
The sample rate conversions are pretty darn good, especially if you do a master quality conversion. Almost no detectable difference except a slight roll off about 20kHz. The CD quality conversion does have more roll off.
As for the time difference, there will be some difference. I have not looked into the numbers you have here to see if that is excessive or not.
Rick
Comment