Tweet
This feature comes in very handy. You don't need it that often, but when you do, it's extremely helpful. I used it twice tonight and it saved at least 10-15 minutes work each time.
Dan
Dan
-
-
I remember during one of the beta test periods, that someone recommended that feature, and so that is why it is in there. Good to know that it is useful.
Craig"Who put orange juice in my orange juice?" - - - William Claude Dukenfield -
That was me that recommended that feature. And I also use it quite often. Much appreciated.
JohnComment
-
Thanks. We are always looking for inputs that lead to product improvements.
Craig"Who put orange juice in my orange juice?" - - - William Claude DukenfieldComment
-
I remember when Sus4chord suggested it, and I thought "I wish I had suggested that one!"
DanDan McDonaldComment
-
I think that I recall thinking: "we should have thought of that before".
Craig"Who put orange juice in my orange juice?" - - - William Claude DukenfieldComment
-
I tried the transfer markers from source to destination on my system. If I have a time offset between the source and destination (I used three CNFs on the file), then the location of the markers in the destination does NOT agree with the same location in the source.
MarcLast edited by Marc Hildebrant; 12-22-2016, 03:51 PM.Comment
-
I don't see how it could sync if there's a time offset. It would either be off going forward or going backward, right?Dan McDonaldComment
-
Dan,
You are correct...the use of the phase "seems to work" should be removed, which I'll do.
MarcComment
-
We still do not know what is causing the time offset.
Craig"Who put orange juice in my orange juice?" - - - William Claude DukenfieldComment
-
Problem dealing with the time offset bug is that it seems to be largely system dependent. Question is this - - - dependent on what? (rhetorical question).
Craig"Who put orange juice in my orange juice?" - - - William Claude DukenfieldComment
Comment